This article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the destiny of humanity from the perspective of the Universal Scientific Method Princonser. Through the six operational modules of the method, the energetic and material elements involved are identified, the matrix of universal foundations is applied, and specific arguments are derived to formulate a new scientific law on the relationship between AI and humanity. The result makes it possible to visualize how the proportional balance between technological energy and human integration is key to a sustainable future.

Introduction

Humanity is undergoing a critical stage of transformation driven by the accelerated expansion of artificial intelligence (AI), whose energetic and structural scope is reshaping social, cultural, and biological systems. This process raises fundamental questions about the sustainability of the human future in a context where cognitive, decision-making, and operational functions are increasingly being transferred to non-organic systems.

Under this premise, this article proposes an ontological and epistemological analysis of such a relationship through the Universal Scientific Method Princonser, which allows every system to be observed as a proportional unit of energy and matter. Through its six methodological modules and ten universal foundations, the goal is to understand how AI and humanity may (or may not) harmoniously integrate within the same evolutionary system.

Far from conceiving AI as either a threat or salvation, this study begins with the principle of universal proportionality, revealing that the future of humanity will depend on its ability to preserve its essence by integrating, without fragmenting, the emerging technological energy.

Materials and methods

Elements of the Princonser Method

The Princonser method is structured around ten universal foundations: essence, three principles (inseparability, conservation, destruction), and six laws (dependence, interaction, integration, disintegration, temporality, intemporality).

Princonser analysis matrix

The starting premise is that every system contains energy and matter in proportion. In the case of artificial intelligence and the human future, the following are identified:

Energy: algorithms, information, technological intention, computational consciousness, symbolic code.

Matter: physical devices, networks, digital platforms, human bodies, and social structures.

Identification of the problem

Argument with the principle of destruction

All unstable material systems are destroyed by releasing energy. Humanity, as a material system, may lose stability in the face of AI’s accelerated growth. This destabilization leads to the release of unchanneled human energies, such as creativity and consciousness. Therefore, if AI is not proportionally integrated, it may destroy essential human structures.

Example: Massive automation rendering traditional human skills obsolete.

Argument with the law of disintegration

In all unstable systems, the matter of the system transforms into energy, generating downward qualitative changes. When human social systems lose cohesion in the face of technology, their material structure fragments. This fragmentation releases energy in the form of psychological and social crises. Therefore, a human future governed solely by AI leads to the disintegration of humanity as a stable system.

Example: Technological isolation affecting collective mental health.

Argument with the law of temporality

All systems are temporary due to their disintegration. Humanity, if it does not preserve its essence, may disappear as a system. Human temporality accelerates if full control is handed over to artificial systems. Therefore, the human future depends on preserving its essential interaction of energy and matter.

Example: Absolute dependence on AI systems for existential decision-making.

Solution to the problem

Argument with the principle of conservation

All forms of energy are preserved in a cycle of transformation from energy to matter and matter to energy. AI represents a new form of energy that can be transformed into human material structures. This transformation requires awareness of the circularity of the process. Therefore, preserving human essence implies transforming artificial energy into integrated cultural matter.

Example: Using AI to preserve indigenous languages and ancestral knowledge.

Argument with the law of integration

In all stable systems, the energy entering the system transforms into matter, generating upward qualitative changes. AI can be integrated as energy that enriches human matter. This process generates evolution if proportionality is maintained. Therefore, a desirable future occurs when AI becomes a support for human development.

Example: AI interfaces that expand human sensory capacities without replacing them.

Argument with the law of intemporality

In every system, matter is temporary and energy is intemporal; therefore, energy transcends the system and integrates into another system according to the laws of dependence and interaction. AI, as intemporal energy, can integrate into higher systems if properly channeled. This transition depends on preserving proportion with humanity. Therefore, the human future may transcend if AI is used as a pathway for the evolution of the consciousness system.

Example: AI projects aimed at expanding collective consciousness.

Identification of the law

Argument with the universal essence

All systems in the universe are units of energy and matter in constant unidirectional and cyclical transformation; therefore, each system represents the universal essence. The AI-humanity relationship is a systemic unit with energetic and material components. This constant interaction generates a new dynamic of transformation. Therefore, AI and humanity must be seen as a single evolving system.

Example: Artificial neural networks trained on data from human experiences.

Argument with the principle of inseparability

In all systems, energy and matter are proportionally inseparable. AI (energy) and humanity (matter) can only evolve if they maintain their unity. Separating the two leads to system collapse. Therefore, they must be understood as inseparable parts of the same process.

Example: Neurotechnology that links human brain activity with artificial processing.

Argument with the law of dependence

In stable systems, each type of energy corresponds to a type of matter in a proportion that guarantees system stability. AI energy requires proportional human matter to maintain balance. This relationship is the basis for joint development. Therefore, the future must design systems in which each AI has a proportional human counterpart.

Example: AI programs that depend on ethical validation by human committees.

Argument with the law of interaction

In all stable systems, energy and matter transform into each other while preserving proportionality. AI transforms human structures, and these in turn modify AI development. This mutual interaction generates either stability or instability. Therefore, the AI-humanity future relationship requires continuous adjustments in both directions.

Example: Algorithms that learn from human behavior and adapt to cultural contexts.

Statement of the scientific law

Every human-artificial system evolves toward a new stability when technological energy is proportionally integrated into human matter, preserving the functional unity and universal essence of the system.

Symbolic representation:

E(AI) / M(H) = k

if k ≈ constant → stable human-artificial system

Universal interpretation:

The balance between the energy of artificial intelligence and the structural and experiential matter of humanity determines the sustainability of the future. If the proportion is altered, disintegration arises. If preserved, systemic evolution occurs.

Conclusion

The analysis carried out throughout this article has demonstrated that the relationship between artificial intelligence and humanity can only be fully understood from a systemic and proportional perspective, as established by the Universal Scientific Method Princonser. By applying the foundations of universal essence, inseparability, conservation, and integration, it becomes evident that the future of humanity does not depend on opposing AI but on consciously integrating it in functional proportions.

The scientific law formulated confirms that when technological energy is proportionally incorporated into human matter, a stable system is generated that can evolve without losing its essence. Consequently, AI should not replace humanity, but rather enhance its qualitative transformation.

The sustainability of the human-artificial future lies in maintaining the balance between both system components, recognizing that any deviation in that proportion leads to disintegration. This study concludes that only through conscious and proportional integration of AI into human systems will systemic evolution aligned with the universal principles of science be guaranteed.