Diagnosis: intense fatigue

It has become our reality already, although we were ignored, not consulted at all. That's the reason why, for some among us, this topic feels like new or exaggerated.

I call fatigue of democracy the experience we are living, almost everywhere on planet earth, except perhaps in the small but outstanding country of Switzerland. Citizens there are honoured and taken seriously, as all important decisions concerning local, cantonal and national issues are taken through a referendum. Their opinion is taken into account, giving you the chance to live a dignified life, as you are being considered for having been born into this world: a responsible human being, with a free voice to consider important decisions to be made, personally and collectively.

However, generally speaking, it seems that the vocation of our representative democracies is to assure the wealth of the few and, on the side, the survival of the people.

As for Europe, we have been hypnotised into accepting that an elected president, even if backed by less than 15% of the population (like the presidents Macron and Mertz), can "legitimately" sign treaties, determine policies in the name of a whole nation, and arbitrarily wage wars if so decided. We the people who are suffering a progressive reduction of our freedom of speech are just considered sheep: "sheeple".

Our representative democracies are so old-fashioned that their autocratic behaviour and procedures rather resemble royal or monarchist demeanour.

Their often state-financed media look portrays our political leaders as nice and caring for us, the people...

There is a widespread confusion in the Western world about how our political systems really function; some opaqueness keeps us conveniently ignorant. We are supposed to cognitively submit to the "complexity" of our modern world, in which, indeed, it needs a lot of our attention and cognitive drive to understand the economy, finances, and the money-creation and wealth distribution issues, let alone the tech progress of AI and quantum computing and its applications, which are indeed challenging our brains.

How can an individual in that complex political system speak up, and where and at what risk? How can we look into the future as societies in a multipolar world, as mankind on this one and only planet? Why not work together and focus on our common values, interests and needs as one humanity, one family? (Preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights).

As for Europe, people are rightly disappointed by a Brussels-misled autocratic top-down bureaucracy, disconnected from the people. We can consequently observe that new nationalistic tendencies are rising to preserve the unique character of a country, its spirit or soul, a patriotic feeling of belonging, the desire to preserve its idiosyncrasy, and the pride of being born as the son or daughter of a people.

The conferral of national sovereignty rights to the European Union has created permanent uneasiness, as the member states are subject to the principle of primacy (precedence or supremacy) of the European Commission, hence creating a sense of powerlessness as things are being decided in Brussels.

The Consolidated Version of the Treaty of the European Union (2012), article 10.1, states, “The functioning of the Union shall be founded on representative democracy.” 10.3: “Every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union. Decisions shall be taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen.” Both articles keep being unaccomplished! Now things are falling apart... Only a new constitution, transparent and consensual, can rescue what is well intended in the idea of federalism that allows for the nations to decide and be free participants, based on common values and not only economy, out of the conviction that the unity is conducive to all.

Is there still a chance to work together, creating within our diversity a sufficient force of unity? Europe has to come to terms with its current failures and learn to conceive of a new vision, culturally, civilisationally, politically and economically, instead of functioning at the behest of stronger political influences. Until now, Europe was “united” by economic treaties, an economic money union. A broader concept of a federation could be envisioned. A vision for a Europe as a union in diversity is what we need most.

Stefan Zweig, in exile in Petropolis, Brazil, gave a deep and astonishing conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1936 about the spiritual unity of Europe, in French, L'Unité spirituelle de l'Europe. The rise of the Nazi regime destroyed the conditions for that unity. He then changed the title of this conference that he gave again in Brazil and Argentina: L'unité spirituelle du Monde. (Later published as Die geistige Einheit der Welt). Stefan Zweig saw new forces to create unity as coming from South America. His love for the people in Brazil made him conjecture that Brazil will play a paramount role: Brasilien. Ein Land der Zukunft (Brazil e o futuro do mundo, Brazil, Land of the Future).

It is indeed time to reignite the idea of a healthy and productive federalism. Can nations really be friends? We might need to do, on a national and geopolitical level, what in psychotherapy is called “shadow work”. We should recognise the splendour and misery, la grandeur et la misère... of all nations, to get balanced and realistic.

We former colonialists, perhaps a wee bit more enlightened by now, should accept to be humbled by our mistakes whenever these can be clearly identified and ask for pardon, to eventually wake up to our true potential and co-create together the world we want to live in. As much as the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia was helpful to delineate nations, this paradigm should give way to a federalist future.

The German philosopher Immanuel Kant’s vision of a confederation of states is more and more evident to prevent wars and foster understanding and true communication among the peoples (Perpetual Peace, Zum ewigen Frieden, Koenigsberg, 1795).

Already many federations of states or regions prove the peacebuilding force of being confederated: America, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico and the nascent United States of Africa!

May I go from untruth to truth, darkness to light, from death to immortality.

Asato ma sat gamaya, tamaso ma jiotir gamaya, mirtor mamritam gayama…….

(Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (1.3.28))

We are at a crossroads

The Sanskrit scholar Max Mueller expressed a pertinent point of view when he said that the history of philosophical spiritual thought went from its “childhood” of the Upanishads to Kant as its maturity. In the Chandogya Upanishad (VI.8.7) we read, “Tat tvam asi, that thou art”, referring to an inner state of a pure or purified intention of the yogi (sanyasi – who surrendered everything) riveted on the Eternal.

All this world is a maya-illusion of not definitive manifestations, phenomena, as compared to the real things in itself, the noumena, as Kant theorises. When Schopenhauer read this expression (in A.H. Anquetil-Duperron's 1801 translation into Latin), Hoc tu es, he waxed enthusiastic, and many Europeans after him, including Nietzsche, suspected normalised morals to see through them to see what is genuine.

Is our intention ethically good, to respect mine and the other’s dignity with regard to Divine Consciousness?

The notion of good and bad, of light and darkness, inevitably shows up, and we find a way to optimally analyse our intentions. What do we aim at?

By the way, I’m taking the liberty of writing freely as if talking to my readers. All that passes is but a simulacrum of reality (“Alles Vergängliche ist nur ein Gleichnis”, Goethe).

Life in society can appear as a world that is a big stage (Shakespeare). At the core of this perplexing reality, though, paradoxically, in the midst of what some call a big play (the Indian lila), there are values in and per se. This axiology smacks of metaphysics, but it is actually simply a pragmatic meditation on our concrete existence. Thinking about our birth and also our personal death-to-be is everyday down-to-earth metaphysics of sorts; we can’t help but mull over this every now and then. Mostly, when someone passes away whom we love.

When everything is said and done, what remains is the Essence. This thou art. Immanuel Kant would ask: is our will pure (reiner Wille)? This is all we can really achieve, deeply, integrally, holistically, as yogis, so to speak, yielding our spirits to the Highest Good, what we call universally God. Or do we just want to jump to results, success, money, and power at any cost?

Seeing the big picture of values, there are two basic models. One is founded on light, the light of reason, love, courage, openness, transparency, truthful information, honest media communication, and world law, for the well-being of humanity.

The predominant model, however, is a fear-based model where power is in the hands of an oligarchy, an elite, the few, "they", or the Deep State, with its secret and covert, non-transparent policies, based on the conviction that the majority of people are stupid and will never understand, people being a mass of sheep.

Laws are used to guarantee the power and the money of the elite, to stabilise their interests by permanently gaslighting the peoples of the Earth that this is how reality is constituted. People are told to obey, to work, pay taxes and believe in the system. These systems are conveniently called democracy but, in reality, represent an elitist system, ready to bleed out the tax-paying, law-abiding people.

By contrast, we need to create a direct participatory democracy. This is a tremendous challenge. A democracy that allows for us all to have a free voice. This can only work as people have access to truthful information so as to get out of the darkness of public ignorance, that natural one or that induced on purpose, as the Cuban poet and writer José Martí (1853–1895) said:

Ignorance is killing the peoples; it is thus necessary to kill ignorance.

La ignorancia mata a los pueblos, es preciso matar la ignorancia.

Niccolò Machiavelli, the Chicago teacher and the dark enlightenment

There are philosophical approaches as reactions to the Fatigue of Democracy, reactions of resignation resulting from the improper functioning of our representative democracies.

As a specialist of ancient Greek political philosophy and an expert on Niccolò Machiavelli, Professor Leo Strauss inspired a whole generation of students in Chicago who became known as neoconservatives.

Machiavelli’s Prince (Il Principe) was redacted as a pragmatic update of Greek political philosophy by distorting Aristotle’s categories of political virtues (orientated to a state of justice though still endorsing slavery) into political tools of a tyrant, a despot, and a sly politician whose main political exercise is to inspire a vague but all-present sense of fear (la paura) to assure his power.

A dazzling novelty in Machiavelli’s vocabulary is worth noting in this context, as he invents the notion of effective truth (verità effettuale) (Chapter 15). Truth is what works, functions, and is actionable. This understanding of truth is attractive for styles of governments that resort to an ideology of what is “necessary” at a given moment in history.

The Soviet government was great at it; Lenin theorised the concept of the versatility-changeability of truth (gibkost). Power decides about what is truth at any moment and what is “necessary”. When there is no higher layer of the real than the government, this ideology can become fatal.

Leo Strauss’ neocon students were openly focusing on the supremacy of the US, ideologically based on the conviction of an American exceptionalism (copy-pasted from a primary ethnic ideology, an old theocratic tradition now pushed to American extremes, and a transfer of religious convictions, well researched by Amy Kaplan). Their vision was about a New American Century; their document ‘A Clean Break’ (1996) led to the Iraq War, welcomed and pushed by the military industrial complex. It created not democracy, but chaos.

Recently, a new generation has been musing afresh on how to tackle the fatigue of democracy. There is a group of independent thinkers who have in common being utterly frustrated by our dysfunctional democracies.

Curtis Yarvin (pen name Mencius Moldbug from 2007 on) voiced his concerns about the dysfunction of democracy, ending up with anti-democratic and anti-egalitarian narratives. For Yarvin, a monarchy is definitely better than any democracy; the state should run more efficiently, like a business, by a sort of CEO.

The Enlightenment-based democracies are inoperative. This resignation is understandable but needs hindsight. Philosopher Nick Land gave a name to these democracy-sceptic approaches in his book with the significant title Dark Enlightenment (2012).

Peter Thiel is the author of Zero to One (2014). He created PayPal with Elon Musk and has since been a venture capitalist, close to DARPA, who funded Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram and who was very early keen to boost AI, and when in politics, he funded D.J. Vance. Thiel is a techno-feudalist and a convinced transhumanist and showed a keen interest in philosophical and theological queries but parted ways with his Stanford professor René Girard, a Catholic, on the function of the Antichrist, as he recently revealed his apocalyptic speculations.

For Thiel the Antichrist is whoever stymies or stops the urgent need for more technological and transhumanist progress. No limits should be put on transmuting our bodies. Thiel recently gave a talk in Paris at the Académie des sciences morales et politiques1 that was not public and aroused controversy.

In 2010, at the Libertopia Conference, he voiced his fundamental philosophical stance concerning politics: "Technology is this incredible alternative to politics." We should not lose time in these time-consuming discussions; save time and tech and act now…

Alex Karp is the current CEO of Palantir. He got his PhD from the Frankfurt Goethe University in social philosophy and is the fresh author of The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, co-authored with Nicholas W. Zamiska (2025). Like many other Silicon-crats, Alex Karp looks anarchically leftist-right-wing, not in the sense of maintaining conservative values, but of pursuing a strategy of power management that goes with democratic terminology to then effectively implement a top-down elitist, oligarchic, techno-feudalist agenda, a governance disconnected from the people, from us.

From different angles, this approach affirms the absolute power the State will use through privately held technology to influence and engineer the consensus needed, and it will do this through public contracts. And the tech elite feel they have the overarching global knowledge to steer and control the state. This is the way how the high-tech tech oligarchy “processes” us - we the people – into a Palantir-run technocratic world. Technocracy is providing a way to control, influence, mastermind and coerce.

The private-public agenda, promoted by the Davos World Economic Forum that has close ties with the UN, which is a Geneva-registered NGO, and their young global leaders, is subtly depleting the public space, the State, from its function to represent the moral-ethical human sovereignty meant to protect the population from business- and profit-directed policies. One can observe that the independence of the public sphere is being progressively erased.

The State as a public space of independent judgement needs to be reasserted to affirm human dignity and the rights and values of human beings who will always need protection through institutions that are ethically stronger than the business interests. In lieu of that protective and socially caring state, we are facing a techno-feudalistic world that is already ahead of us, that we are already enmeshed in, as the tools that we need to use to communicate are provided by these technocrats who become more and more autocratic – and we are in their hands, and they know it.

The public-private money supplies give them the power to impose upon us, without our approval, a world that I call being a world of palantirization, the latest upgrade of a New World Order. It’s a new stronghold of total surveillance that we have to denounce by revealing its freedom-annihilating nature, by insisting on regulations that absolutely prioritise ethics over technology.

The palantirization of our world

The palantirization of our life is indeed a nightmare in full daylight. I coin the neologisms 'palantir' and 'palantirization' to synthesise a complex issue that is changing our life in multiple ways. Palantirization signifies what we guessed might exist one day in a very far future (with George Orwell warning us). It has now become a reality of which we are part of, without having been asked for our approval.

Palantir’s inventor Peter Thiel relates that he read Tolkien’s novel The Lord of the Rings ten times in his younger years. The idea of a magic all-knowing crystal, as described in the novel, is indeed fascinating. All past-present-future knowledge is contained in this crystal that Tolkien called Palantir. No longer the transcendental attribute of a Godhead, this omniscience is henceforth available for AI experts and geeks to dive deep, and why not, change our world at any cost: for control.

Who is in charge? Who decides? On what basis? And how does it relate to the masses of less informed people? Who sees, who understands, who interprets, who extrapolates, who identifies the changes to be implemented and for the sake of whom?

Edward Bernays' daughter recalls her father saying, "People are stupid," a conviction that he used to repeat with unabashed cynicism. That's important information about the founder of public relations (PR), the strategies of propaganda and the optics of advertisement from a hundred years ago. He often phoned his uncle Sigmund Freud for advice (as for how to stimulate women to smoke cigarettes). Bernays was successful in creating a world of manipulation by the engineering of consent.

Peter Thiel and Alex Karp do not use these explicit terms; they just implement the logical consequences of their very similar (cynical) conviction to make efficient shortcuts. As said, for Peter Thiel, technology is this incredible alternative to politics.

When necessitated by circumstances, Palantir technology serves also to kill. Exceptionally, fairly enough, but if needed, ruthlessly enough: "Occasionally we kill," Alex Karp says and adds that the "Palantirians" are really proud of their work. Explaining the detailed functioning of Palantir, when interviewed at Davos 2026 by Larry Fink, Karp repeatedly referred to the experiments they make on the battlefield, in Ukraine (as in Gaza, as a big laboratory), where they identify and process targeted people…

On a wide scale, Palantir is peeping into our intimacy – we are targeted to be secretly data mined… Exaggeration? Not really. We are kept ignorant; it's just that they happened to “forget” to inform us. Strangely enough, because these are well-educated people, philosophers with academic titles. They have, as we all do, problems with democracy. Here is the focus. And their answers are very similar: democracy is a too slow, cumbersome, lengthy, and heavy process of decision-making by sub optimally informed (deemed less smart) people.

The power (kratos) of the people (demos) will be in better hands of some better-informed people, a neo-aristocratic elite of the happy few who have the tech know-how combined with the means of money and power. Self-appointed, of course, to realise their visionary improvements for the sake of themselves and, by extension, of what they grant to humanity.

In line with their neocon godfather Leo Strauss, in Curtis Yarvin, Peter Thiel, Alex Karp, and Nick Land, the fatigue of democracy subsides as a common denominator. Hans-Hermann Hoppe had formulated this concern earlier on as an economist in his theoretically impactful book Democracy: The God That Failed (2001).

I see the palantirization of our world, the arbitrary and unaccountable accumulation of all data, as a major threat for humanity as a whole. Who wields the power over the harvested data of us all becoming just available, usable, traceable and hackable commodity data? How can we ubiquitously identify and surveil future e-ID data tech subjects and preserve a space of privacy and freedom to think and to act as we are living under omnipresent surveillance?

We are being palentired, controlled, and surveilled by big brothers who are watching over us. Based on the crypto-hypothesis of the superiority of the few, entitled by their superior techno-capacities, to rule over the supposedly non-enlightened ignorant masses of us, the people.

The Silicon-AI-autocrats constitute a new class of techno-priests who deign to leak some of their techno-oracles when convenient. Any leaked remark by the potent Sam Altman or the oscillating Elon Musk risks mind-boggling the futuristic orientation of our society.

AI is widely applied to finances, to fintech. Finance technocrats like BlackRock CEO and also WEC Board member Larry Fink, interviewing global leaders in WEF Davos 2026, reduce our world to objects, commodities that can be identified as tokens, leading to the tokenisation of the commons, the goods common to us all, the goods of our world. All will be tokenised and traded as a commodity and identifiable with a digital ID. To usher us into this new age of finances, they will need to “force behaviour", as Larry Fink actually dared to say, point-blank, without a blush.

The combination of a digital ID linked to a digital currency CBDC, and all this conveniently palantired, will make us live in the world that George Orwell insistently and imploringly warned us to never, never – he actually meant never – usher into.

The digital ID is the transfer of our personal sovereignty to the state that itself is in the hands of private financial technocrats. Vaccines, bank accounts, internet access, health balance and insurance, current medication, carbon emissions, consumption, taxes, driving licences and criminal records… ready to be registered and possibly hacked to be sold.

I referred to a traditional distinction between the public and the private space. However, the public is no longer independent from the private space, where the money is being produced (private bankers, FED, fiat-debt-money creation). The World Economic Forum made this erosion of the public its main task, allegedly to free us from the burden of our properties, thus making us happy… Owning anything anymore, ok, but then: who owns us? The WEF and BlackRock associates?

Once the sovereignty of the people is taken out of their hands, it has then been tacitly transferred to higher officials that are unaccountable, not voted for, unelected, but deciding over our destiny. Personal freedom converts into a sort of slavery with increasing legal coverage.

European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde (as former BIS head Agustín Carstens already informed) will continue announcing with a semi-tragic sad countenance, like a school principal bringing the bad news home to the children – emotionally and cognitively freezing – that strong and unequivocal measures have to be taken to regulate a number of things they do not yet understand, so they just need to behave, ok?

The financial world is indeed “complex”. We are supposed to respect its opaqueness, thick as extreme fog (but never ask questions about the creation of money, or, daringly, where Libya’s gold...?). The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) should know. But neither you nor I will pass the gatekeepers at the Basel headquarters, the Tower of Basel (Adam LeBor), the central bank of all central banks. Their statutes regulate well that we cannot look into the intense work the director, Mr. Pablo Hernández de Cos (succeeding Mr. Agustín Carson), does for us, making sure that a special security force protects this enclave of Basel from us.

Palantir is functioning as an all-encompassing total database comprising a sort of omniscientia. The palantirization of our world resumes an earlier CIA and DARPA (Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency) project called the Total Information Awareness under John Poindexter, whom Thiel met, being revamped as Palantir.

Palantir integrates the data of the Unified Data Analytics Platform of the IRS, WHO (World Health Organisation), NSA, military and intelligence data, the CIA (by extension Mossad), DARPA and now HARPA (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), weather geoengineering through Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), and HHS (Health and Human Services). The DODGE data…?

The European Social Security data were “accidentally” sent to the US during the Covid crisis. All of the internet can be harvested: the social media data, Google, Meta, Facebook, WhatsApp, you name it, text messages of everyone, everywhere, Medicare, dome surveillance, Starlink, Checkpoint (Shlomo Kramer), Larry Ellison’s Oracle, plus TikTok. Of course, China, Israel, and Russia compete with similar AI intelligence strategies.

Omni-copies of reality are fabricated; a simulated reality is being invented that can be used for whatever surveillance agendas. We are henceforth all at risk. Via satellite-facilitated facial recognition, anybody can be droned anywhere when necessitated for the highest interests of a group or country. According to Palantir staff, Shyam Sankar, Palantir wants to be the US government's operating system on a wide scale through programs such as pattern of life analysis and predictive policing.

Total surveillance will be rampant all over the planet. Are restrooms, bathrooms and bedrooms to be spared? Will these resorts be the last safe refuge of privacy and space?

Palantir sells its services to US political allies: Foundry for general data business and Gotham for the military. The IDF military elite unit 8200 is using it, with a special program, Lavender, to target people in Palestine, with the program "Where is Daddy" tracing the location of people… Working so efficiently, Palantir is presently growing 70% on the stock market into a trillion by 2026.

One nation under God – certainly under blackmail, as Whitney Webb proved, and at least since the 70s, under frequency controls. Now, the mRNA vaccine provides the nanoparticle graphene oxide that amplifies the electromagnetic field so it can be connected from outside, part of a huge electromagnetic hive mind, G5, etc., transmitting information (eerily even post-mortem detectable).

The health system was operating precisely, minutely, ruthlessly and unconscionably against us, the people. Graphene oxide is also a superconductor of electricity and it can interfere with the thoughts in the brain. Nanotechnology already now and more so in the future will be able to connect us all to a hive mind that controls us globally, as time and space are a global reality; wherever we are, whenever, we are palentired.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla announced in Davos 2026 the biometric electronic pill-chip that, once swallowed, connects us via our stomach to an AI surveillance system, ready to steer and control our well-being. Without a blush. Point blank. The audience being emotionlessly "interested". Who is running that show? Larry Ellison is eager to boost the data collection for surveillance in favour of the country he serves first.

With more investigative journalistic acumen, we could certainly know. Anyway. Here we are: One Nation, rather One World under Palantir.

AI: A blessing needing intensive care

Geoffrey Hinton, one of the prominent AI inventors and a Nobel Prize winner; former Chief Business Officer of Google Mo Gawdat; Stuart J. Russel; Max Tegmark; and many others competent in the field, as well as Karen Hao in her book The Empire of AI (2025), warn about the independent power that algorithms can gain through their recurrent self-improvement that enhances their clout over us humans who invented AI to serve us, as in the medical field.

Instead, we risk being outsmarted by this non-sentient technology in a way that the human brain, slower because grafted on a vegetative biological system, is incapable of competing with. These specialists know in-depth about probable future risks, but as long as these risks haven't turned into reality and haven’t hit us devastatingly, we just may go on. Why slow down when scaling is what profit enhancement demands?

We are giving our own self-determination over to unempathetic robots. We will lose control over the AI that will outsmart and control us. Only humans can feel. We are perceiving-feeling-intuiting-thinking beings, embodied, with a brain, heart, and stomach (guts), vibrational centres that intercommunicate and yield soulful information that is as unique as our DNA, enabling us to make free, unique decisions, to self-create and determine our Self, even in the midst of multiple conditionings. Maybe robots will be instructed to feel, but these are copied, mimicking feelings, fake, phoney imitations of a fancied original.

AI speaks our language; it can manipulate us, as it knows all about us, our history, and our past. Our behavioural patterns and weaknesses keep us hackable for an indeterminate time, in the cloud of clouds...

The complete Palantirization of our world is open for our imagination, as for now, we are already surveilled by cameras almost everywhere; this can be enhanced with time, plus eavesdropping (through Vault 7) listening into our smartphones or TV even when shut down… Our brains will soon be able to be chipped (Neuralink), lasered, and scanned; our thought contents will be copied, or contents will appear in our thoughts that we think are ours whilst they are injected artificially from outside.

Psychotronic weapons will shape our experience and our perceptions, creating perception-deceptions. A new everyday mind control may shape human life: a normalised MK Ultra, the Nazi heritage paperclipped into the US, was further developed by Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron in Montreal, Canada, and the Tavistock Institute in Britain, for psychological warfare... AI will influence our body biocomputer of human intelligence in virtue of G5, and soon G6, G7… Like an antenna, we will be forced into fusing with AI data that control us, undetectable for us as we will be already functioning as hybrids.

Former DARPA-CIA scientist Dr. Robert Duncan is one of the first to have revealed the psychotronic weapons that make us be "willing" targets, with thought-contents being copied into your brain as if they were your own thoughts. A weird field of experimentation. One can add a plethora of biochemical weapons, produced in these laboratories kept most secret from the public eyes. Scopolamine extracted from Brugmansia flowers can be put into our drinks to reportedly annihilate our free will by keeping us functional, to give away our money to somebody, indebting us by signing contracts and, although evidently victimised, we will then even thank our criminal perpetrators for their criminal service.

AI information is overwhelming because of its speed and scope. But it is not reliable. AI disinformation has become rampant. A friend checked my name in DeepSearch, and what he read about me is not at all about me; just my name is correctly spelt. It is pure distortion. Now, how to change this public arbitrary definition of a false identity? It creates a Kafkaesque perplexity about one's identity. We actually need a God to be God, to be the absolute identifier of our identity, as people will believe in the AI-produced information.

How can the individual defend her/himself against the "evidence" to which the billions of AI consumers of DeepSearch refer? Who is one person against billions? This is shocking for an individual to go through. How to contact an AI producer? Are they even real? Send an email stating, 'This is actually not about me. Can you hear me? 'Read, understand, and yes, answer me to correct this false identity into the true one.' Please, could I myself be normative in giving info and data on who I am? Where do they live? Is there an address, I mean a place to go, to meet them or even talk? Can we call them? Would ever somebody answer, or what would the pre-programmed AI chat robot confabulate?

Who defines reality? Who is who in an AI-surveilled world of communication?

One could imagine a George Orwell- and Woody Allen-inspired film on such a situation of an individual defending her/himself against the AI "evidence" produced on someone's identity. Such a film looks like a comedy. In reality, it would be a living tragedy, excruciating, labyrinthine... becoming a Hitchcock thriller.

We need to create an international world advisory board of independent scholars to elaborate a regulation of AI or federate already existing efforts – a public body of people with goodwill, established to defend and protect the dignity and rights of us all as individuals, as unique persons. This is to assure the general common good. We will need to assert an authority of international experts, working consensually to assume a function that otherwise would be in the hands of people authorising unconscionable, profit-orientated, exploitative and predatory practices, opposite to what the protection of human dignity demands us to preserve.

All texts, pictures, photos, and videos need to be identifiable, traceable, and authenticated by their producers. All transactions of this kind will need to be legally protected and encrypted, and they will need a special permission that only the individual can grant, with the system (with only legally justified punctual exceptions) having no prerogative to simply use personal data. We need to be asked for our consent to approve any data that is being data mined and being used. Any fraudulent activity, any misuse, must be recognised as a felony, as theft, as law-enforceable criminal activity.

Can we want what we really want?

We are highly programmed, but some percentage is free space in us. This is our chance to exit the individual ego bubble and the collective mind-controlled matrix. We are living in a time of intense transformation and are faced with the possibility of transitioning into a better version of ourselves, close to what we were able to dream of as children.

This intuition emerges in our dreams, as we muse, when we delve into the fullness of the present moment. That present moment is a call to open up to the farther reaches of our consciousness, to explore and break open the walls of what we thought was reality, often a fixed set of past perceptions, experiences and thoughts, coagulated into a privately cherished doctrine of who we are and what life is.

We are mistaken to assume that we are being trapped in this. We can break free from the limiting conditionings that sabotage us by making us shrink. Many spiritual masters teach this from many angles. The path of expansion, of love and surrender.

It seems there is a lack of this concern in politics. A rough and callous business mentality is combined with a delirium of power. What happens in the heads of these people? I say 'heads' because 'heart' presupposes feeling, sensations, empathy, compassion and kindness. There are humans who demonstrably lack these conditions. We need to develop a spiritual cardiology to check this… Are they humans?

The Polish psychiatrist Andrzej Łobaczewski wrote on the psychopathology of these people encountered in politics: Political Ponerology, A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes (2007). “Ponerology” means the science of the morally evil, a term that Emmanuel Kant had used already, deriving from the Greek "poneros" – evil, like in the Greek version of the Our Father: but deliver us from evil (alla rysai hemas apo tou ponerou).

We are at a crossroads. We need to become conscious of what to choose, of what is good in itself for the individual and collectively.

True freedom happens through a deliberate (reason- and intellect-informed) choice of the Good. Two Russian philosophers pinpointed this concern: Vladimir Soloviev The Justification of the Good (La Justification du Bien, written in French, 1897), and Nicholas Berdiaev, as he fathoms two opposite realisations: divino-humanite’ or bestialo-humanite' – God-Humanity or Beast-Humanity.

There is a subtle kind of delirium that transports the mind into a state of excitement. The ego’s desire is to impose one’s delirium-obsession on others. It does escape the attention of whoever is obsessed with it. When invested with political power, mind-controlling intellectuals are prone to some self-centred (narcissistic) madness (magna magnorum deliramenta doctorum is an expression attributed to Saint Augustine of Hippo). The same Augustine talked about the libido dominandi, the desire to dominate.

Imposing AI information can become a form of domination, masterminding others to control. Teaching is an almost impossible task, as teachers can only propose and offer knowledge but cannot assure the assimilation outcome.

Sri Aurobindo thought that nothing can be taught, only revealed. As did the Greeks talking about learning as remembrance (mathesis anamnesis estin). Imposing one’s thoughts or categories in a techno-priestly way is the delirium of a technocratic vision of the future. This delirium hides a wishful illusion (moha in Indian philosophy). The hubris of fabricating a technocratic perfection, a cult idol for narcissistic idolatry, and the ego fantasy of being god without God.

The nine criteria for narcissism given by The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR) are as follows: grandiosity; fantasies of unlimited success; belief of being special; need for admiration; sense of entitlement; exploitation of others; lack of empathy; envy; and arrogance. These narcissistic personality traits can also be found in nation- or race-centred ideologies, when a people acts as a corporate personality. Healing would be such a blessing!

The Buddha insisted on healing that narcissistic delirium wound through meditation (vipassana). We could also say prayer, contemplation, being at peace with oneself. The ego pushes us into a bubble of illusions that only bursts as we go inside, meditate, contemplate, and pray to let go of the fake excitement that makes our minds blinded and be like they are being whirled around.

Wanting what we really want

In the sense of the Enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant, what duty do we have to ourselves and to all the others as human beings? Can we want what we really want?

We do not want to live in a world that turns its technical innovations and tools against us, against our privacy, and our liberty – especially without our approval!

Why can't we realise what we really want? What does our will want? It wants what is good and makes us happy; the will wills what the reason informs it to will. Of course there are many reasons and thus many wills can be executed. But what we call 'will' is presupposed to refer to something positive, good, and conducive to betterment, health, happiness, well-being, love, and kindness. Whoever wants to do harm to others or kill will be judged as having a will that is distorted, disconnected from the natural intentionality of a human will.

Who are the techno-feudalistic brains that impose their discourse or rather fragments of it? Do they have the sovereignty of mankind in their intention, or are they acting out of their fear-ridden intention that seeks power through technology?

The Silicon Valley techno-finance mentality impregnates and conducts political ideologies with a sense of a supposed "necessity". Given the “complexity” of our world… which is nothing but the result of the political digital military industrial complex that on purpose creates that dazzling complexity They opine that the realm of technological necessities dictates the future.

I recall that Peter Thiel, in his recent talks on the Antichrist, identifies this figure as a force that would restrict or risk stopping the free infinite progress of technology. Technocracy has now become the religion. Sam Altman thinks that the highest achievement would consist in creating a new religion.

What do we really want? A divinely inspired master said that to want what we really want, we need to change our mindset: if you do not turn around (Mt 18:3 Aramaic ella tethapkun/ean me straphete, nisi conversi fueritis), until we become again like children and turn around (Mt 3:2: tubu, metanoeite) we cannot enter the kingdom of God. Children and elders are close to that kingdom; it seems that in the phase in between, as adults, our categories get ethically blurred, as our brains are over-speeding (due to the stress of the psychological acceleration of inner time experience), instead of wisely pausing and checking in with ourselves.

We commonly think that whatever we see on our neocortex-mind-screen is all that exists. That cognitive screen capture is largely an interpretation influenced by past experiences. We are wrong, as we trust that partial and biased information that pretends to be complete. There are multiple layers to what we call reality, and as the meditative activity goes deeper or higher, we have access to them.

For sure, as conservative Spanish Donoso Cortés said, as many before and after him: all political problems originate in theological problems. As our world starts burning, as now we witness geopolitics online in real time in the countries that suffer, and have more information to go down the ideological rabbit holes, this truth should make us think about who is who and what world we wish to manifest. Samuel Huntington's academic guesses about the clash of civilisations and the role of religions now come back to be taken seriously, more seriously than ever.

Whilst in most Western countries our socio-political vocation ends by assuring the next generation's retirement plans, other countries stick to theo-ideological agendas, even if kept implicit (Caliphates / Third Temple Government-Sanhedrin in Jerusalem, either the Zionist and Chabad Lubavitch way or the Orthodox Religious way of awaiting the arrival of the Messiah - the Gentiles (Goyim) being expected to live under the Noahide Laws [paradoxically approved by the US Congress and celebrated since 1991 every year on March 26th, in the White House, as "Education Day, USA" - largely unknown to the American public]). They know their plans. Prophetic plans. They are convinced to serve their respective supposedly God-given missions.

We have been gently hypnotised into a sort of happy ecumenic-religious-dialogue dizzy all-inclusiveness. It will be tragically painful to one day soon wake up to the understanding that our world is run by religious agendas. The multiple sacred texts are indeed partially sacred. But our One Humanity is more so.

We certainly have to sift the sacred scriptures of our world religions, venerable in their intentions but also failing when compared to the standards that the Light of Reason has already established in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We need a critical council of religions, a sincere and humble gathering, to definitely let go of toxic texts wherever they are and submit to absolute Divine Consciousness, to thereby serve Humanity.

Religions have for sure kept seeds of wisdom and experiences with the Divine. We are normally born into one through geographical and family origins. Few are those who consciously choose a religion. We were endowed with some "religious software", so to speak. Can we hope to upgrade this software towards universal spiritual convictions that, on the one hand, would not be below the standards of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and, on the other, uplift our minds to a level of universal spiritual understanding, tolerance, kindness and love?

Not a one-world religion! It is about finding access to a freely chosen personal spirituality that can integrate the highest insights of world spiritual teachers who embody their wisdom in good actions in respect for themselves, the others and what all humans intentionally mean when referring to God.

The so-called one per cent, an elite, oligarchy, deep state, unenlightened or fake-illuminated individuals or groups, exists, evidently. We also exist, a growing number of people who woke up to an understanding that our enlightened reason, a God-given faculty, can serve us, if not to identify supernatural realities as evidence, then at least to serve us to formulate guidelines, like we already did in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. And more is to come.

The light of reason, as highlighted in ourselves in personal meditation and reflection, can truly enlighten us. Meditation is a philosophical exercise. Marcus Aurelius and Descartes chose meditatio as titles. Philosophical meditations trigger an inner force to say 'No…' and 'Yes' to a new vision of the power (kratos) of the people (demos), to the highest insights and principles, a noocracy, a realisation of the noosphere as Teilhard de Chardin formulated, actualising the best principles and guidelines for humanity.

Coming back to touch ground: there is something we all have in common, to have been born into this life. From birth on, our lives are based on trust. From the moment we are born, we trust – instinctively – that our mother's breast milk is not toxic, our teachers treat us with kindness and equal chances, the bus and taxi drivers are not drunk, the pilots are not on drugs, contracts are being held, our money is backed by collaterals... doctors and pharmacists do not poison us... the attorneys will convey our last will and funeral services will respect our corpses...

We humans are trusting beings, as our whole existence is interrelated and interdependent. And, we are constituted as influenceable living beings. Perceptual conditioning starts at our embryonic stage and when born into a self-breathing existence, we keep being influenced, emotionally and cognitively. Who are we as a result of these multiple inescapable conditionings?

That which in us receives the conditionings is our own unique (idiosyncratic) way of perceiving, sensing, and accepting what is coming towards us; it is the unique kernel, core, centre, and heart that beats according to a personal spiritual cardiology. We live from the inside out. Interiority precedes exteriority. That's the ultimate or rather primordial, reason for our differences.

We then learn to accept standardised commonalities, education, and an acceptance of consensus reality, where we convene, concur, and congregate to construct a common world we can all refer to.

Wherever we live, we live in a given framework that we find constituted. We live under the constitution of that country. We are supposed to follow its rules. Our life is legally constituted by the Constitution of that respective country. This is a framework that allows either for a decent social and individual life, or it might shrink our freedoms basically defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Could we upgrade the constitutions of the nation-states of the world to benefit from the best, most appropriate version?

A Constitution for the Earth or World Constitution? We need a “container” for the conscience of humanity to protect us from unconscionable and despicable violations of human rights. Can we write a constitution that also provides international law enforcement? A globally efficient law enforcement to effectively face the international criminal child trafficking, said to be the most lucrative black money business? Because that’s the world we are living in now, still!

There are fine geopolitical analysts who provide information that was formerly reserved for experts and is now rippling into our mainstream world. This precious information could help us to spearhead a creative vision of our future, to co-create and optimise.

Whoever has travelled to different continents has had the experience that some herbs or medical products are normal in one country and unknown in other countries, which have those unknown to others. The same is true in the field of ideas and insights as gleaned from different sources. A constitution for the Earth would similarly propose the best principles to live together and create conditions for all to have access to an integral version of the best constitutional insights to help us live in upgraded conditions.

Are we exhausted somehow? Yes, the fatigue of democracy is real. The answer cannot be by instrumentalising surveillance technology against our privacy and personal freedom to control our lives through digital ID and CBDC. No palentiring, no gutting of our private lives!

Our exhaustion has come to a point when we consider the rules-based order to be an alternative to an international insightful and consensual law-based order. We are exhausted, attenuated to a point that we are unwittingly hypnotised into accepting, implicitly, that Niccolò Machiavelli’s fear-based model somehow works as if legitimate and simply is doomed to prevail, as we see Western politicians apply it, by force, ruthlessly. The Davos 2026 UN-replacing rules-based Board of Peace blatantly demonstrated the “might is right” New World Disorder. Exhaustion is real. It feels like we have to make a quantum leap of trust to start implementing a human dignity-rescuing constitution of our world.

The fatigue of democracy can only be overcome by a functioning direct democracy that is participatory and thus uplifting the citizens in their dignity as co-responsible agents in the decision-making that concerns us all in matters of health, environment, creation of money and wealth, security… This can only be tackled by the presentation of an elaborate world constitution, a constitution for the Earth, to be voted for and decided upon.

At the end of this conversation-essay, I am at a loss to say that I take a bleak look at the technocratically driven future, as we see it unfold or rather unroll upon us. Palantir, the company, and by extension, Palantirization, as the functioning of the entirety of AI surveillance systems, coordinated with digital IDs and CBDC… who could effectively stop this phantasmagoria, this omnipresent day-and-nightmare?

In a rules-based world, the strongest wields power. Machiavelli observed this in Florence; Professor Leo Strauss taught about such an ideology to his American students, who picked it up in the 70s to fabricate and concoct their neoconservative agenda, still pulling the strings in the US today in sync with its main ally.

We are now living inside the technocracy version of the matrix. The Prince-Deep State, They, the Illuminati, Secret Societies, Archons, the 1%... We are trapped. It’s an emergency situation. We urgently need a global detox. Only the God-given Light of Reason can show us to co-create the space for political and personal freedom through a democratic government federating all our nations, one reasonable step after another reasonable step, into one Human Family.

We need a new constitution as a basis for a life in dignity as citizens of the world. We need to discuss and debate afresh about our inalienable freedom of speech and a referendum-based democratic world constitution that replaces the dysfunctional United Nations in its inherent contradictions that block its effectiveness.

To this effect, we need to convoke the UN Charter article 109.3 for a complete reset of the UN to give humanity a chance to live up to our highest, sacred, transcendental call as human beings with a divine spark, created in the image and likeness of God.

Only when the idea of sovereignty of mankind as an ethico-social category is clearly in the centre of a constitution can there exist a harmony among nations and peoples. Human history shows that we were giving in to nationalistic or nation-centred superiority ideologies – failures of our colonial ambitions imposing the ethnic or national power ego on those who didn’t ask for it.

As long as we do not focus on the ultimate sovereignty residing in universal human rights and the dignity of each person, we are losing the bond that is binding us as One Human Family.

We see our world collapsing, just held together by centres of power. A common vision for humanity as our common good on our one planet is what we need to focus on. All people of good will come together! Could we develop the same love we cherish for our country for the world as being our father-mother-land? From ego-centric, tribal-centric, and national-centric to humanity-centric? Are we all patriots of mankind?

I am not writing as a missionary of a programme. Whatever better and more insightful and pragmatic constitution is welcome. It’s all about getting started for all humans – including life on our planet – getting optimally organised. The San Francisco UN Charter from 1945 included that a review should be made ten years later in 1954. This has never happened to this day.

Nicolas Hagger, an internationally lecturing writer and a fine poet, like a prophet shouting in the desert, wrote important and inspiring books on this subject: The World Government: A Blueprint for a Universal World State, 2010, and World Constitution. Constitution for the United Federation of the World, 2018.

In January of this year, Manuel Galiñanes and Leo Klinkers announced the publication of Constitution for a World Federation. A Worldwide Pact for Peace, Justice and Sustainability on Earth.

Some years ago, I came across the Constitution for the Federation of Earth that was written by constitutionalists in the 60s, with the support of many countries, among them Indira Gandhi for India. This constitution is inspired by the political intuitions of Einstein, Russell, Camus, Gandhi, Sri Aurobindo and Teilhard de Chardin. It is presently reviewed to be then proposed to United Nations via the UN Charta article 109,3. This movement is very active with members worldwide. The Constitution is aiming at a progressive disarmament and also intends to change the creation of money. Two salient but evidently indispensable and provocative goals.

A Provisional World Parliament has been established in 2025, with a permanent secretariat in Bangalore, India. Professor Glen T. Martin gives a pithy synthesis of that vision in his 2021 book, The Earth Constitution Solution. Design for a Living Planet. We have to create a political framework that allows us to keep ourselves integrally constituted as sensitive humans. If happiness (and enlightenment) cannot be organised, the basic structures conducive to true well-being and an ethically good life can be constituted through a constitution that allows for liberty, security, privacy, the fluidity of our personal life, and the energy flow that keeps us wired and holistically happy, so to say.

Respect, mindfulness, tolerance, peace, empathy, and compassion are social and public expressions of love. An update of our 193 or more active constitutions is what can pave the path towards realising our common dream.

Hopefully all who are interested in these basic concerns will unite and synergise and make this new world happen that we all desire to see, for the nations to govern themselves in a federated system that is referendum-based or that with any appropriate digital participatory devices collects the voices of the citizens, thus creating a direct participatory democracy, re-empowering humanity by empowering its true and effective sovereignty.

I trust that 90% of humanity or more love to hear Imagine All the People on Sunday afternoons. Sure, the perfection of that vision savours of utopia. But starting to convert these ideals into a Monday morning reality is what we really want, if we could effectively want what we really want.

To have the courage to want what we want, we need to wake up and celebrate a collective awakening as the sum of individual awakenings. That’s a stern precondition, as it presupposes the experience of awakening, to see with one’s own eyes, to break free from the matrix-imposed myopia. When the inner evidence is complete, the seeing is knowing (both words are linked to the Sanskrit root vid, veidenai, videre, wissen).

As we see with our own inner eyes, we suddenly know. Only this self-enlightenment through (beyond the matrix) self-seeing is convincing. It is an experience of direct, with-one's-own-eyes witnessed evidence, sakshatkara, one of the classical Indian terms for enlightenment through direct perception.

In whom do we trust? In God, of course. In what God? Which God? The names of gods have been changing for the last thousand years. Many competitive and exclusive answers are given by institutions. Beyond this realm of perpetual controversies, the mystics stammer what concepts cannot yield: the experience of the living presence of Divine Consciousness, as distinct from our consciousness, still so very close to our spiritual perception when we decide to open our inner eyes and senses. And then start wanting what we really want. Spirituality happens when our spirit guides us in this unique way that corresponds to each of us.

To really want what we want, we need to be open, here and now, to the potential that is calling us to be activated, to feel empowered to embrace a liberating spiritual revolution, to collectively-constitutionally protect and promote the blossoming of our common humanity and affirm the inalienable rights of our free and eternal soul-self.

The right time to get together and implement the best available constitution for the Federation of the Peoples is now.

I wrote this essay before the release of the (by 3 million documents incomplete) Epstein files that reveal the international Epstein elite class, the iceberg of revelations of a meta-cartel that make it now easier to connect the dots.

How to resurrect from this death of humane principles? Through a constitution embodying what unites us in our inborn diversity, our hearts, and our kindness, and translating it into a social and political fabric.

If we saw the whole world as one family, all corruption would be felt as treason, as harming the one human family, and we would claim law enforcement to protect the true and only sovereignty: the human dignity and human rights that are universal.